<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video &#8211; BOS vote to remove chairman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nemasket.net/video-bos-vote-to-remove-chairman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nemasket.net/video-bos-vote-to-remove-chairman/</link>
	<description>Bellicose ... yes, but loved by all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:24:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://nemasket.net/video-bos-vote-to-remove-chairman/comment-page-1/#comment-4218</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemasket.net/?p=2143#comment-4218</guid>
		<description>look at the affliation between Duphily, Brunelle and Spataro.
That should take care of any questions any one has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look at the affliation between Duphily, Brunelle and Spataro.<br />
That should take care of any questions any one has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republic</title>
		<link>http://nemasket.net/video-bos-vote-to-remove-chairman/comment-page-1/#comment-4217</link>
		<dc:creator>Republic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemasket.net/?p=2143#comment-4217</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree, there definitely is at least the appearance of something negative here. I also feel she should have recuse herself. if nothing for nothing else; to avoid the appearence of any indirect or direct benefit/conflict of interest. Falling to do so creates the conflict of interest and the appearence of some direct or indirect benefit to said person or family(spouse). I feel the best remedy would be a review by the ethics committee and a voluntary removal as chairperson. Its seems to me it is power politics at its worst at our local level of town governance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree, there definitely is at least the appearance of something negative here. I also feel she should have recuse herself. if nothing for nothing else; to avoid the appearence of any indirect or direct benefit/conflict of interest. Falling to do so creates the conflict of interest and the appearence of some direct or indirect benefit to said person or family(spouse). I feel the best remedy would be a review by the ethics committee and a voluntary removal as chairperson. Its seems to me it is power politics at its worst at our local level of town governance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

